So the NY Times buries a
mea-culpa on page A10. The main culprit in the scandal, Judith
"I was proved fucking right" Miller (or
"She who must not be named" at the Times) is
nowwhere to be seen in this "apology".
Ok, that's all bad enough, but what really burns me is the 9 "representative" letters to the editor in today's edition.
Look closely... notice something missing?
Looks like the readers seem to be incapable of mentioning Miller's name as well. I find that completely obscene that the Times expect us to believe that the responses they received didn't have any complaints regarding their omission of Chalabi's bitch from the article.
I'll let the new Get Your War On sum up my feelings on this.